{"193": {"top_level_match": "false", "events": [{"id": 797310, "title": "CREATE", "description": "Chairman's Opening Statement to Strand", "url": "/m2/session/11480#797310", "type": "CREATE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-subtype-script-add.svg", "session_id": 11480}, {"id": 797916, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Confidentiality", "url": "/m2/session/11483#797916", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 11483}, {"id": 798117, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Confidentiality", "url": "/m2/session/11482#798117", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 11482}, {"id": 798307, "title": "CREATE", "description": "Strand 2 Media Release (22 July", "url": "/m2/session/11490#798307", "type": "CREATE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-subtype-script-add.svg", "session_id": 11490}, {"id": 798647, "title": "CREATE", "description": "Business Committee", "url": "/m2/session/11588#798647", "type": "CREATE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-subtype-script-add.svg", "session_id": 11588}, {"id": 798650, "title": "CREATE_FROM", "description": "Business Committee", "url": "/m2/session/11490#798650", "type": "CREATE_FROM", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-subtype-script-import.svg", "session_id": 11490}, {"id": 799116, "title": "CREATE", "description": "Chairman's Statement on", "url": "/m2/session/11490#799116", "type": "CREATE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-subtype-script-add.svg", "session_id": 11490}, {"id": 799434, "title": "DEBATE_MOTION", "description": "9. Dr Paisley then asked if Item 7 of the Workplan had been reached. The Minister of State replied that business now rested with the very last words of Item 6. All parties had identified common", "url": "/m2/session/11411#799434", "type": "DEBATE_MOTION", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-debate.svg", "session_id": 11411}, {"id": 799896, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Statement of the Chairman on Ending the Current", "url": "/m2/session/11413#799896", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 11413}, {"id": 799906, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Visit of SDLP to Dublin", "url": "/m2/session/11449#799906", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 11449}, {"id": 799908, "title": "DEBATE_MOTION", "description": "The Government Team said that all the delegations were aware of the agreement on confidentiality.", "url": "/m2/session/11449#799908", "type": "DEBATE_MOTION", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-debate.svg", "session_id": 11449}, {"id": 799910, "title": "DEBATE_MOTION", "description": "The SDLP delegation said that their visit to Dublin was one of a regular series of contacts to discuss matters of common concern. No question arose of a breech of", "url": "/m2/session/11449#799910", "type": "DEBATE_MOTION", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-debate.svg", "session_id": 11449}, {"id": 800199, "title": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "description": "10. The Alliance Delegation concluded by indicating that, while they were not likely to create any difficulties over the proposals, it was possible that if the substantive discussions in strand one", "url": "/m2/session/11416#800199", "type": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-debate.svg", "session_id": 11416}, {"id": 801030, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Confidentiality", "url": "/m2/session/11643#801030", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 11643}, {"id": 801031, "title": "DEBATE_MOTION", "description": "In discussion, the UDUP delegation commented that if the Irish Government made comments about the Talks, it was entitled to reply. It was noted that as the Talks moved into the remaining strands, the", "url": "/m2/session/11643#801031", "type": "DEBATE_MOTION", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-debate.svg", "session_id": 11643}, {"id": 801094, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Confidentiality", "url": "/m2/session/11462#801094", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 11462}, {"id": 801381, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Breach of", "url": "/m2/session/11463#801381", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 11463}, {"id": 801913, "title": "DEBATE_MOTION", "description": "and the Government Team reasserted the importance of press confidentiality, and urged restraint if approached by", "url": "/m2/session/11462#801913", "type": "DEBATE_MOTION", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-debate.svg", "session_id": 11462}, {"id": 801970, "title": "ADOPT_PROPOSAL", "description": "7. The Government Team said it was important for the process to continue as planned, in order to ensure whoever was responsible for the leak did not gain a victory. They said there would be a", "url": "/m2/session/11463#801970", "type": "ADOPT_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-decision-adopt.svg", "session_id": 11463}, {"id": 801972, "title": "DEBATE_MOTION", "description": "4. The DUP delegation said they had considered whether it was proper to continue the deliberations given the lack of trust which the leak would engender, but had concluded that whoever was", "url": "/m2/session/11463#801972", "type": "DEBATE_MOTION", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-debate.svg", "session_id": 11463}, {"id": 802208, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Expression of Gratitude for Maintaining", "url": "/m2/session/11454#802208", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 11454}, {"id": 802954, "title": "DEBATE_MOTION", "description": "The Alliance Party delegation reaffirmed that Sub-Committees were not decision-taking bodies, but the forum in which common ground could be maximised, and issues discussed. It was for the Plenary", "url": "/m2/session/11451#802954", "type": "DEBATE_MOTION", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-debate.svg", "session_id": 11451}, {"id": 822396, "title": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "description": "The Alliance Party said privacy and confidentiality were important but the talks were not secret. Too tight a restriction on media activities could be counter-productive leading to speculation, to", "url": "/m2/session/11414#822396", "type": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-debate.svg", "session_id": 11414}, {"id": 822690, "title": "ADOPT_PROPOSAL", "description": "The Secretary of State noted that confidentiality at this stage was of extreme importance and that achieving agreement on the location of the second strand talks was a critical part of getting to", "url": "/m2/session/11414#822690", "type": "ADOPT_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-decision-adopt.svg", "session_id": 11414}, {"id": 822727, "title": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "description": "3. Dr Paisley endorsed Mr Molyneaux's remarks. He said that the two parties would be speaking with one voice during the talks. He wished, however, to clarify one point. The Unionists were attending", "url": "/m2/session/12468#822727", "type": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-debate.svg", "session_id": 12468}, {"id": 822914, "title": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "description": "Dr Paisley added that it was the British Government who were convening the talks and it was they who should host them. If the talks were held in Dublin then the Secretary would not be able to chair", "url": "/m2/session/12468#822914", "type": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-debate.svg", "session_id": 12468}, {"id": 822940, "title": "CREATE_FROM", "description": "Conclusion of Meeting with Alliance Party on 30 April", "url": "/m2/session/12472#822940", "type": "CREATE_FROM", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-subtype-script-import.svg", "session_id": 12472}, {"id": 823263, "title": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "description": "Confidentiality and the", "url": "/m2/session/12477#823263", "type": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-amend.svg", "session_id": 12477}, {"id": 823319, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Complaint Regarding", "url": "/m2/session/11434#823319", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 11434}, {"id": 823333, "title": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "description": "Confirmation of the SDLP", "url": "/m2/session/11434#823333", "type": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-amend.svg", "session_id": 11434}, {"id": 823369, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Breach of Security: Confidentiality of the", "url": "/m2/session/12478#823369", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 12478}, {"id": 823834, "title": "NO_OBJECTION", "description": "Dr Alderdice agreed, but explained that there had clearly been substantial press briefing prior to his delegation going on the record, and that it was important for each side to have confidence that", "url": "/m2/session/12488#823834", "type": "NO_OBJECTION", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-decision-implied-adopt.svg", "session_id": 12488}, {"id": 823836, "title": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "description": "Confidentiality", "url": "/m2/session/12488#823836", "type": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-amend.svg", "session_id": 12488}, {"id": 827604, "title": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "description": "8. Expanding on the paper, the Alliance Party said that they believed that there serious difficulties and impracticalities [sic] in compressing the programme on the lines suggested by the Unionists.", "url": "/m2/session/11646#827604", "type": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-debate.svg", "session_id": 11646}, {"id": 827632, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Delay Discussion of Confidentiality", "url": "/m2/session/11409#827632", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 11409}, {"id": 827677, "title": "REPORT_PROPOSAL", "description": "It was agreed that the Business Committee would accordingly recommend that there shall be a renewed commitment to confidentiality.\n\n[Editor's Note: The recommendations of the Business Committee will", "url": "/m2/session/11646#827677", "type": "REPORT_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-decision-refer.svg", "session_id": 11646}, {"id": 827680, "title": "CREATE_FROM", "description": "Proposal to Plenary: Recommendations of the Business Committee on Interactions with the", "url": "/m2/session/11409#827680", "type": "CREATE_FROM", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-subtype-script-import.svg", "session_id": 11409}, {"id": 831052, "title": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "description": "Rule of", "url": "/m2/session/12686#831052", "type": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-amend.svg", "session_id": 12686}, {"id": 831056, "title": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "description": "Rule of Confidentiality for", "url": "/m2/session/12686#831056", "type": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-amend.svg", "session_id": 12686}, {"id": 831491, "title": "NO_OBJECTION", "description": "[Editor's Note: An agreed position on confidentiality is", "url": "/m2/session/12686#831491", "type": "NO_OBJECTION", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-decision-implied-adopt.svg", "session_id": 12686}, {"id": 831492, "title": "NO_OBJECTION", "description": "[Editor's Note: An agreed position on confidentiality is", "url": "/m2/session/12686#831492", "type": "NO_OBJECTION", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-decision-implied-adopt.svg", "session_id": 12686}, {"id": 831494, "title": "DROP_PROPOSAL", "description": "[Editor's Note: The PUS is clearly concerned that too strong a line has been taken with regard to a rule of confidentiality for the Chairman.]\n\nReturning to the subject of confidentiality the PUS", "url": "/m2/session/12686#831494", "type": "DROP_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-decision-drop.svg", "session_id": 12686}, {"id": 831495, "title": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "description": "Revised Position on", "url": "/m2/session/12686#831495", "type": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-amend.svg", "session_id": 12686}, {"id": 831580, "title": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "description": "Confidentiality", "url": "/m2/session/12567#831580", "type": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-amend.svg", "session_id": 12567}, {"id": 831582, "title": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "description": "Confidentiality: Press and Public", "url": "/m2/session/12567#831582", "type": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-amend.svg", "session_id": 12567}, {"id": 831589, "title": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "description": "Confidentiality: Briefing of the", "url": "/m2/session/12567#831589", "type": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-amend.svg", "session_id": 12567}, {"id": 832963, "title": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "description": "The Secretary of State said the Government Team had not defined the type or level of staffing that might be most appropriate for Strand Two. He was aware that it was the view of the Unionist", "url": "/m2/session/12727#832963", "type": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-debate.svg", "session_id": 12727}, {"id": 835278, "title": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "description": "3 . The UUP said that they had treated the Alliance Party paper seriously and believed that the time that was left available to the process afforded a positive opportunity for achievement. The", "url": "/m2/session/11646#835278", "type": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-debate.svg", "session_id": 11646}, {"id": 836751, "title": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "description": "5. The SDLP did not believe that it would be wise for any party to expose their final negotiating position at such an early stage. The SDLP believed that the Government Team had its own, (albeit", "url": "/m2/session/11646#836751", "type": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-debate.svg", "session_id": 11646}, {"id": 841619, "title": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "description": "Agreements Reached at Party Leaders Meeting 29 April 10.30", "url": "/m2/session/13076#841619", "type": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-amend.svg", "session_id": 13076}, {"id": 841646, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Confidentiality: Government", "url": "/m2/session/11448#841646", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 11448}, {"id": 841647, "title": "ADOPT_PROPOSAL", "description": "The Government Team gave an assurance that it would remain loyal to the confidentiality agreement without", "url": "/m2/session/11448#841647", "type": "ADOPT_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-decision-adopt.svg", "session_id": 11448}, {"id": 846154, "title": "NO_OBJECTION", "description": "[Editor's Note: There is no objection as the discussion moves on, and the parties are at least theoretically signed up to the confidentiality", "url": "/m2/session/11462#846154", "type": "NO_OBJECTION", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-decision-implied-adopt.svg", "session_id": 11462}, {"id": 850132, "title": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "description": "Statement by Party Leaders on Leak at Plenary Session (Government", "url": "/m2/session/13327#850132", "type": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-amend.svg", "session_id": 13327}, {"id": 861498, "title": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "description": "Confidentiality and Minutes of Sub-Committee", "url": "/m2/session/11528#861498", "type": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-amend.svg", "session_id": 11528}, {"id": 861522, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Confidentiality", "url": "/m2/session/11456#861522", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 11456}, {"id": 865912, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Reiteration of", "url": "/m2/session/11470#865912", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 11470}, {"id": 887683, "title": "ADOPT_PROPOSAL", "description": "[Editor's Note: It is very likely that the press release referred to the breach of", "url": "/m2/session/11463#887683", "type": "ADOPT_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-decision-adopt.svg", "session_id": 11463}, {"id": 898533, "title": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "description": "CONFIDENTIAL\n\nFROM D A Hill\nTalks Team\n8 June 1992\n\ncc PS/Mr Hanley (L&B)\nPS/PUS (L&B) - B\nPS/Mr Fell - B\nMr Thomas (L&B) - B\nMr Bell (L&B) - B\nMr Watkins - B\nMr Cooke - B\nMr Maccabe - B\nMr D J R", "url": "/m2/session/14213#898533", "type": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-debate.svg", "session_id": 14213}, {"id": 898610, "title": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "description": "2. Overall, there was evidence of a firm desire on the part of all present to identify the nature of the obstacles presently facing the talks and to explore possible ways round them. (The Business", "url": "/m2/session/13860#898610", "type": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-debate.svg", "session_id": 13860}, {"id": 898627, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Consult Parties and Resume on Friday", "url": "/m2/session/13860#898627", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 13860}, {"id": 898720, "title": "ADOPT_PROPOSAL", "description": "5. Given that this seemed a sensible approach, albeit slower than might be desirable, I will explain how matters stand to Mr Close so that the Alliance Party knows what to expect tomorrow. I will", "url": "/m2/session/14227#898720", "type": "ADOPT_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-decision-adopt.svg", "session_id": 14227}, {"id": 901649, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Confidentiality and the", "url": "/m2/session/14362#901649", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 14362}, {"id": 905168, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Request to Maintain Confidentiality", "url": "/m2/session/11478#905168", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 11478}, {"id": 908197, "title": "ADOPT_PROPOSAL", "description": "the Chairman re-emphasised the crucial importance of maintaining confidentiality in relation to all the proceedings in Strand", "url": "/m2/session/11483#908197", "type": "ADOPT_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-decision-adopt.svg", "session_id": 11483}, {"id": 910224, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Confidentiality ", "url": "/m2/session/11490#910224", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 11490}, {"id": 910301, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Confidentiality", "url": "/m2/session/11489#910301", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 11489}, {"id": 949629, "title": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "description": "Confidentiality", "url": "/m2/session/11632#949629", "type": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-amend.svg", "session_id": 11632}, {"id": 949631, "title": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "description": "5.\tReturning to the location of the second strand, Dr Alderdice repeated that the Alliance Party were prepared to talk at any time, to anybody and anywhere. The only issue for them was one of", "url": "/m2/session/11632#949631", "type": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-debate.svg", "session_id": 11632}], "committees": [], "delegations": [], "people": [], "sessions": [{"id": 11490, "title": "1992-07-22 10:30:00 in the All-Party Negotiations", "url": "/m2/session/11490"}], "session_ids_for_event_results": [11480, 11483, 11482, 11490, 11588, 11411, 11413, 11449, 11416, 11643, 11462, 11463, 11454, 11451, 11414, 12468, 12472, 12477, 11434, 12478, 12488, 11646, 11409, 12686, 12567, 12727, 13076, 11448, 13327, 11528, 11456, 11470, 14213, 13860, 14227, 14362, 11478, 11489, 11632], "session_data_for_event_results": {"11480": {"committee_name": "All-Party Negotiations", "session_date": "06 Jul 1992, 14:00"}, "11483": {"committee_name": "All-Party Negotiations", "session_date": "07 Jul 1992, 09:45"}, "11482": {"committee_name": "All-Party Negotiations", "session_date": "08 Jul 1992, 09:15"}, "11490": {"committee_name": "All-Party Negotiations", "session_date": "22 Jul 1992, 10:30"}, "11588": {"committee_name": "Business Committee Strand 2", "session_date": "21 Jul 1992, 15:00"}, "11411": {"committee_name": "All-Party Negotiations", "session_date": "01 Jul 1991, 14:20"}, "11413": {"committee_name": "All-Party Negotiations", "session_date": "03 Jul 1991, 10:05"}, "11449": {"committee_name": "All-Party Negotiations", "session_date": "05 May 1992, 10:35"}, "11416": {"committee_name": "British-Alliance Talks", "session_date": "14 May 1991, 16:50"}, "11643": {"committee_name": "All-Party Negotiations", "session_date": "01 Jul 1992, 15:52"}, "11462": {"committee_name": "Political Structures Sub-Committee", "session_date": "12 May 1992, 10:30"}, "11463": {"committee_name": "Political Structures Sub-Committee", "session_date": "13 May 1992, 10:35"}, "11454": {"committee_name": "All-Party Negotiations", "session_date": "19 May 1992, 10:40"}, "11451": {"committee_name": "All-Party Negotiations", "session_date": "11 May 1992, 10:33"}, "11414": {"committee_name": "British-Alliance Talks", "session_date": "30 Apr 1991, 14:40"}, "12468": {"committee_name": "British-Unionist Talks", "session_date": "03 May 1991, 10:30"}, "12472": {"committee_name": "Office of the Strand 1 Chairman (British Government Delegation)", "session_date": "03 May 1991, 12:00"}, "12477": {"committee_name": "British-Unionist Talks", "session_date": "07 May 1991, 11:50"}, "11434": {"committee_name": "British-SDLP Talks", "session_date": "08 May 1991, 11:25"}, "12478": {"committee_name": "British-Unionist Talks", "session_date": "08 May 1991, 11:53"}, "12488": {"committee_name": "British-Alliance Talks", "session_date": "08 May 1991, 15:55"}, "11646": {"committee_name": "Business Committee Strand 1", "session_date": "25 Jun 1991, 10:00"}, "11409": {"committee_name": "All-Party Negotiations", "session_date": "25 Jun 1991, 10:40"}, "12686": {"committee_name": "British-Alliance Talks", "session_date": "22 May 1991, 14:03"}, "12567": {"committee_name": "British-Unionist Talks", "session_date": "22 May 1991, 14:40"}, "12727": {"committee_name": "British-Unionist Talks", "session_date": "28 May 1991, 14:10"}, "13076": {"committee_name": "Party Leaders", "session_date": "29 Apr 1992, 10:30"}, "11448": {"committee_name": "All-Party Negotiations", "session_date": "29 Apr 1992, 11:35"}, "13327": {"committee_name": "Party Leaders", "session_date": "15 May 1992, 10:30"}, "11528": {"committee_name": "Business Committee Strand 1", "session_date": "26 May 1992, 16:40"}, "11456": {"committee_name": "All-Party Negotiations", "session_date": "26 May 1992, 16:00"}, "11470": {"committee_name": "All-Party Negotiations", "session_date": "01 Jun 1992, 12:12"}, "14213": {"committee_name": "Office of the Strand 1 Chairman (British Government Delegation)", "session_date": "08 Jun 1992, 09:00"}, "13860": {"committee_name": "Political Structures Sub-Committee", "session_date": "27 May 1992, 10:30"}, "14227": {"committee_name": "British-Unionist Talks", "session_date": "27 May 1992, 15:15"}, "14362": {"committee_name": "British-Irish Bilateral Talks", "session_date": "12 Jun 1992, 16:00"}, "11478": {"committee_name": "All-Party Negotiations", "session_date": "12 Jun 1992, 11:40"}, "11489": {"committee_name": "All-Party Negotiations", "session_date": "24 Jul 1992, 10:30"}, "11632": {"committee_name": "British-Alliance Talks", "session_date": "07 May 1991, 11:20"}}}, "186": {"top_level_match": "false", "events": [{"id": 797059, "title": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "description": "Statement on Multi-Party Talks at Stormont: DUP", "url": "/m2/session/11562#797059", "type": "PROPOSE_DOCUMENT_AMENDMENT", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-amend.svg", "session_id": 11562}, {"id": 797302, "title": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "description": "Ms McWilliams: The Northern Ireland Women's Coalition, in contributing to this debate \u2014 particularly on the Ulster Unionists' motion \u2014 is conscious of the fact that all the parties involved in the", "url": "/m2/session/11562#797302", "type": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-debate.svg", "session_id": 11562}, {"id": 800135, "title": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "description": "Mr Peter Robinson: This has been a very worthwhile debate, and there have been many very useful contributions. I welcome the fact that the Ulster Unionist Party, having tabled an amendment, did not", "url": "/m2/session/11614#800135", "type": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-debate.svg", "session_id": 11614}, {"id": 801902, "title": "DEBATE_MOTION", "description": "The Chairman: I do not, but I wonder if Ms Sagar would like to say anything about the matter.\n\nMs Sagar: I have not been speaking to the press, but that is neither here or there. We have not given", "url": "/m2/session/11659#801902", "type": "DEBATE_MOTION", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-debate.svg", "session_id": 11659}, {"id": 801979, "title": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "description": "The Chairman: There are four more Members who would like to speak, including MrHughSmyth, who has returned.\n\nDo you want to speak, Mr Smyth?\n\nMr Hugh Smyth: Not on this subject, Mr Chairman. I have", "url": "/m2/session/11667#801979", "type": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-debate.svg", "session_id": 11667}, {"id": 803399, "title": "POSTPONE_DEBATE", "description": "Mr Ken Maginnis: On a point of order, Mr Chairman. You will recall that on a previous point of order I raised the issue of those who infringe the confidentiality of Committees before the Forum has", "url": "/m2/session/11693#803399", "type": "POSTPONE_DEBATE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-decision-postpone.svg", "session_id": 11693}, {"id": 803759, "title": "DROP_PROPOSAL", "description": "FORUM: COMMITTEES\n(CONFIDENTIALITY)\n\nMr Morrow: On a point of order, Mr Chairman. I understood that you were to make a ruling in relation to a matter concerning the Alliance Party, which was raised", "url": "/m2/session/11703#803759", "type": "DROP_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-decision-drop.svg", "session_id": 11703}, {"id": 803764, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Request the Alliance party to correct its statement", "url": "/m2/session/11703#803764", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 11703}, {"id": 803766, "title": "DROP_PROPOSAL", "description": "The Chairman: My response to the point about confidentiality is that there is no Rule to prevent a Committee member from coming out and making any statement. However, it is only right that the", "url": "/m2/session/11703#803766", "type": "DROP_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-decision-drop.svg", "session_id": 11703}, {"id": 803768, "title": "DROP_PROPOSAL", "description": "The Chairman: A lesson that I learned a long time ago is that I cannot always get my own views expressed. I am not going to breach confidentiality by describing how a certain Committee got on", "url": "/m2/session/11703#803768", "type": "DROP_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-decision-drop.svg", "session_id": 11703}, {"id": 804847, "title": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "description": "Mr Casey: I also wish to support the motion. When the concept of universal suffrage was first mooted, the political parties North and South held the view that not only the living should have a vote,", "url": "/m2/session/11713#804847", "type": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-debate.svg", "session_id": 11713}, {"id": 831243, "title": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "description": "The Chairman: Mr Casey, do you want to speak on this?\n\nMr Casey: Very reluctantly.\n\nThe Chairman: I am not twisting your arm.\n\nMr Casey: I am always averse to bringing criticism on myself. We do not", "url": "/m2/session/11688#831243", "type": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-debate.svg", "session_id": 11688}, {"id": 984566, "title": "DEBATE_MOTION", "description": "[Mr McCartney:] My next point concerns the suggestion that this body cannot discuss issues that may be the subject of detailed and confidential negotiation at Stormont. That suggestion does not bear", "url": "/m2/session/11249#984566", "type": "DEBATE_MOTION", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-debate.svg", "session_id": 11249}], "committees": [], "delegations": [], "people": [], "sessions": [{"id": 11703, "title": "1997-02-28 10:07:00 in the The Forum", "url": "/m2/session/11703"}], "session_ids_for_event_results": [11562, 11614, 11659, 11667, 11693, 11703, 11713, 11688, 11249], "session_data_for_event_results": {"11562": {"committee_name": "The Forum", "session_date": "04 Oct 1996, 10:00"}, "11614": {"committee_name": "The Forum", "session_date": "15 Nov 1996, 10:04"}, "11659": {"committee_name": "The Forum", "session_date": "06 Dec 1996, 10:03"}, "11667": {"committee_name": "The Forum", "session_date": "13 Dec 1996, 10:04"}, "11693": {"committee_name": "The Forum", "session_date": "21 Feb 1997, 10:02"}, "11703": {"committee_name": "The Forum", "session_date": "28 Feb 1997, 10:07"}, "11713": {"committee_name": "The Forum", "session_date": "13 Jun 1997, 10:03"}, "11688": {"committee_name": "The Forum", "session_date": "14 Feb 1997, 10:02"}, "11249": {"committee_name": "The Forum", "session_date": "20 Sep 1996, 10:03"}}}, "353": {"top_level_match": "false", "sessions": [], "committees": [], "delegations": [], "people": [], "events": [{"id": 1441139, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Confidentiality of the", "url": "/m2/session/42395#1441139", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 42395}, {"id": 1441167, "title": "EXTERNAL_MOMENT", "description": "3.30 pm\n\nThe Secretary of State for Northern Ireland\n(Mr. Peter Brooke)\n\nWith permission, Mr. Speaker, I will make a statement about political development in Northern Ireland.\n\nI am pleased to be", "url": "/m2/session/42402#1441167", "type": "EXTERNAL_MOMENT", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-orientation-external.svg", "session_id": 42402}, {"id": 1442516, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Maintain", "url": "/m2/session/42572#1442516", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 42572}, {"id": 1442559, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Assurances of", "url": "/m2/session/42579#1442559", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 42579}, {"id": 1442692, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Confidentiality", "url": "/m2/session/42581#1442692", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 42581}, {"id": 1442795, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Confidentiality", "url": "/m2/session/42589#1442795", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 42589}, {"id": 1442806, "title": "DEBATE_MOTION", "description": "8. Butler asked about the relationship between this initiative and the Hume/Adams talks. The Irish side explained the Taoiseach was greatly concerned to maintain confidentiality. Clearly the key", "url": "/m2/session/42589#1442806", "type": "DEBATE_MOTION", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-debate.svg", "session_id": 42589}, {"id": 1442908, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Confidentiality", "url": "/m2/session/42593#1442908", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 42593}, {"id": 1443043, "title": "REJECT_PROPOSAL", "description": "16. [...] (Butler was evasive on this, possibly because of the confidentiality of any Privy-Council", "url": "/m2/session/42599#1443043", "type": "REJECT_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-decision-reject.svg", "session_id": 42599}, {"id": 1443277, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Confidentiality", "url": "/m2/session/42603#1443277", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 42603}, {"id": 1443782, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Confidentiality", "url": "/m2/session/42646#1443782", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 42646}, {"id": 1444031, "title": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "description": "3. Continuing, Mr Hume said that he was hoping to see Mr Haughey next week and would recommend acceptance of this proposal. It would be a private meeting conducted on the basis of complete", "url": "/m2/session/42658#1444031", "type": "DEBATE_PROPOSAL", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-doc-debate.svg", "session_id": 42658}, {"id": 1444112, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Confidentiality", "url": "/m2/session/42670#1444112", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 42670}, {"id": 1444403, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Confidentiality: Privy Council", "url": "/m2/session/42722#1444403", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 42722}, {"id": 1444523, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Possible Briefing of Ian", "url": "/m2/session/42727#1444523", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 42727}, {"id": 1444650, "title": "SECTION_MARKER", "description": "7. He ended by saying that he would be in touch again soon. \n\n8. At no time did Fr Reid say he was acting as an intermediary and I am still unclear as to whether he is acting independently or", "url": "/m2/session/42740#1444650", "type": "SECTION_MARKER", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-orientation-blank.svg", "session_id": 42740}, {"id": 1444703, "title": "DEBATE_MOTION", "description": "[...] Father Reid moved on to what he is most interested in, creating some sort of dialogue which will help to \u201cgive the IRA an alternative to their armed struggle\u201d. He then raised the point he had", "url": "/m2/session/42748#1444703", "type": "DEBATE_MOTION", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-debate.svg", "session_id": 42748}, {"id": 1454484, "title": "PROCEDURE", "description": "Confidentiality", "url": "/m2/session/42717#1454484", "type": "PROCEDURE", "icon_url": "icons2/icon-procedure-motion.svg", "session_id": 42717}], "session_ids_for_event_results": [42395, 42402, 42572, 42579, 42581, 42589, 42593, 42599, 42603, 42646, 42658, 42670, 42722, 42727, 42740, 42748, 42717], "session_data_for_event_results": {"42395": {"committee_name": "British Government", "session_date": "29 Nov 1989, 12:00"}, "42402": {"committee_name": "British Government", "session_date": "26 Mar 1991, 15:30"}, "42572": {"committee_name": "Prime Minister-Taoiseach Meetings", "session_date": "10 Dec 1993, 15:00"}, "42579": {"committee_name": "Anglo-Irish Liaison Group", "session_date": "01 Oct 1993, 12:00"}, "42581": {"committee_name": "Anglo-Irish Liaison Group", "session_date": "21 Oct 1993, 10:20"}, "42589": {"committee_name": "Butler-Nally Meetings", "session_date": "14 Jul 1993, 12:00"}, "42593": {"committee_name": "Butler-Nally Meetings", "session_date": "10 Sep 1993, 12:00"}, "42599": {"committee_name": "Butler-Nally Meetings", "session_date": "10 Nov 1993, 12:00"}, "42603": {"committee_name": "Butler-Nally Meetings", "session_date": "13 Dec 1993, 15:45"}, "42646": {"committee_name": "Informal British-Irish Bilaterals", "session_date": "08 Dec 1993, 12:00"}, "42658": {"committee_name": "British-Hume Bilaterals", "session_date": "05 Dec 1990, 12:00"}, "42670": {"committee_name": "British-Hume Bilaterals", "session_date": "28 Oct 1993, 12:00"}, "42722": {"committee_name": "British-Molyneaux Bilaterals", "session_date": "18 Oct 1993, 14:00"}, "42727": {"committee_name": "British-Molyneaux Bilaterals", "session_date": "25 Nov 1993, 12:00"}, "42740": {"committee_name": "British-Reid Bilaterals", "session_date": "07 Sep 1989, 11:45"}, "42748": {"committee_name": "British-Reid Bilaterals", "session_date": "06 Mar 1990, 12:00"}, "42717": {"committee_name": "Irish-Eames Bilaterals", "session_date": "13 Dec 1993, 19:30"}}}}

{"116": {"top_level_match": "false", "id": 116, "name": "Writing Peace: John Alderdice 1985-1992", "items": [{"id": 12980, "title": "Letter From Jim Molyneaux - 16 December 1987", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/12980"}, {"id": 13505, "title": "Statement On Confidentiality - 22 July 1992", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/13505"}]}, "295": {"top_level_match": "false", "id": 295, "name": "Writing Peace: Monica McWilliams Collection", "items": [{"id": 16974, "title": "Points Of Agreement And Discussion On Confidentiality In Plenary - 24 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/16974"}]}, "351": {"top_level_match": "false", "id": 351, "name": "Writing Peace: The National Archives of the UK (TNA)", "items": [{"id": 24058, "title": "Memo from Anthony Pawson to Stephen Wall Regarding Membership in the Joint Declaration Initiative", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/24058"}, {"id": 31924, "title": "Note from S G Brearley enclosing a revised paper on confidentiality circulated by the Independent Chairmen on 30 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/31924"}, {"id": 31938, "title": "Note from David Lavery enclosing an alternative draft of paragraph 4 of the 'Points of Agreement' paper on confidentiality, 24 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/31938"}, {"id": 31940, "title": "Note from David Lavery enclosing the British Government's briefing material for use at the Plenary session on the principle of confidentiality, 24 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/31940"}, {"id": 34510, "title": "Note from S G Brearley enclosing a revised paper on confidentiality circulated by the Independent Chairman to all participants, 30 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/34510"}, {"id": 34522, "title": "Memo from the Independent Chairmen to all participants enclosing a paper on confidentiality with points of agreement and questions for discussion, 24 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/34522"}, {"id": 34523, "title": "Note from Alan Whysall with comments on the Independent Chairmen's paper on confidentiality, 24 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/34523"}, {"id": 34524, "title": "Briefing note from Alan Whysall regarding the discussion of confidentiality in the multi-party talks, enclosing a speaking note for the British Government and extracts from the British Government minutes of meetings from 23 and 24 September, 30 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/34524"}, {"id": 34526, "title": "Note from David Lavery with a possible alternative draft of paragraph 4 of the 'Points of Agreement' regarding confidentiality as circulated by the Independent Chairmen on 24 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/34526"}, {"id": 34527, "title": "Memo from the Independent Chairmen to all participants enclosing a paper on confidentiality with points of agreement and questions for discussion, 24 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/34527"}, {"id": 34528, "title": "Note from David Lavery enclosing briefing material for use at the resumed Opening Plenary session for the discussion on confidentiality, 24 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/34528"}, {"id": 34529, "title": "Note from David Lavery enclosing briefing material for use at the resumed Opening Plenary session for the discussion on confidentiality, 24 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/34529"}, {"id": 34531, "title": "Note from David Lavery enclosing briefing material for use at the resumed Opening Plenary session for the discussion on confidentiality, 24 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/34531"}, {"id": 36773, "title": "Note from S G Brearley enclosing a revised paper on confidentiality circulated by the Independent Chairmen on 30 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/36773"}, {"id": 38049, "title": "Enclosure: Record of a meeting of the Business Committee on 8 October 1997 at 10.00", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/38049"}]}, "125": {"top_level_match": "false", "id": 125, "name": "Writing Peace: George J. Mitchell Collection", "items": [{"id": 24727, "title": "Record of introductory informal discussion on procedural guidelines and agenda for plenary session on 12 June 1996 at 11.45", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/24727"}, {"id": 24743, "title": "Record of informal discussion on procedural guidelines and agenda for plenary session on 25 June 1996 at 11.06", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/24743"}, {"id": 24782, "title": "Record of an opening plenary meeting on 23 September 1996 at 14.33 (OIC/PS12)", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/24782"}, {"id": 24792, "title": "Record of an opening plenary meeting on 14 October 1996 at 22.41 (OIC/PS28)", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/24792"}, {"id": 24801, "title": "Record of an opening plenary meeting on 21 October 1996 at 12.08 (OIC/PS30)", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/24801"}, {"id": 24879, "title": "Record of an opening plenary meeting on 3 December 1996 at 13.25 (OIC/PS54)", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/24879"}, {"id": 24900, "title": "Record of an opening plenary meeting on 18 December 1996 at 11.12 (OIC/PS57)", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/24900"}, {"id": 25526, "title": "Record of liaison subcommittee on decommissioning meeting, 25 February 1998, 14.40", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/25526"}, {"id": 25729, "title": "Note from DUP with points and questions regarding confidentiality, 24 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/25729"}, {"id": 25733, "title": "Undated alternative draft paragraph 4 from points of agreement in the paper on confidentiality proposed by the British Government", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/25733"}, {"id": 25735, "title": "Memo from the Chairmen to all delegates enclosing a paper on confidentiality, 24 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/25735"}, {"id": 25736, "title": "Enclosure 1: Paper on confidentiality, 23 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/25736"}, {"id": 25737, "title": "Memo from Kelly Currie to George Mitchell regarding rules of confidentiality and points of agreement, 4 December 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/25737"}, {"id": 25739, "title": "Enclosure 1: Revised paper on confidentiality, 29 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/25739"}, {"id": 25740, "title": "Enclosure 1: Cover letter from the Chairmen to all participants enclosing the revised paper on confidentiality, 30 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/25740"}, {"id": 25741, "title": "Note from the Chairmen to all delegates enclosing the revised paper on confidentiality, 30 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/25741"}, {"id": 25742, "title": "Enclosure 1.1: Revised paper on confidentiality, 29 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/25742"}, {"id": 25743, "title": "Memo from the Chairmen to all delegates enclosing a paper on confidentiality, 24 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/25743"}, {"id": 25744, "title": "Document record form for revised paper on confidentiality, 30 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/25744"}, {"id": 25745, "title": "Enclosure 1: Revised paper on confidentiality, 29 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/25745"}, {"id": 25746, "title": "Enclosure 1: Paper on confidentiality, 23 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/25746"}, {"id": 25747, "title": "Note from the Chairmen to all delegates enclosing the revised paper on confidentiality, 30 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/25747"}, {"id": 25748, "title": "Undated alternative draft paragraph 4 from points of agreement in the paper on confidentiality proposed by the British Government", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/25748"}, {"id": 25749, "title": "Document record form for revised paper on confidentiality, 30 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/25749"}, {"id": 25751, "title": "Note from DUP with points and questions regarding confidentiality, 24 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/25751"}, {"id": 25782, "title": "Record of review plenary meeting on 16 December 1997 at 17.55", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/25782"}]}, "384": {"top_level_match": "false", "id": 384, "name": "Writing Peace: David Trimble Collection", "items": [{"id": 27286, "title": "DUP submission on procedural guidelines for the conduct of the multi-party talks", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/27286"}, {"id": 27322, "title": "UUP minutes of the talks on 11 June 1996, first session, 09.14", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/27322"}, {"id": 27343, "title": "Northern Ireland negotiations \u2013 Rules of Procedure, 29 July 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/27343"}, {"id": 27451, "title": "Northern Ireland negotiations \u2013 Rules of Procedure, 29 July 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/27451"}, {"id": 27556, "title": "List of issues for the Opening Plenary meeting on 1 October 1996 at 11.00", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/27556"}, {"id": 27733, "title": "Letter from Michael Ancram to David Trimble on decommissioning, 4 February 1997", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/27733"}, {"id": 27808, "title": "Enclosure 1: Paper on confidentiality emerging from discussions on 23 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/27808"}, {"id": 27810, "title": "Memo from the Chairmen to all delegates enclosing a paper on confidentiality dated 24 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/27810"}, {"id": 28155, "title": "Rules of procedure as adopted unanimously, 29 July 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/28155"}, {"id": 28162, "title": "Rules of procedure: Chairmen's compromise text", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/28162"}, {"id": 28180, "title": "Key paragraphs \u2013 comparison of SDLP and UUP proposals on the rules of procedure, 17 July 1996, 10.15", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/28180"}, {"id": 28204, "title": "Opening plenary meeting agenda", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/28204"}, {"id": 28214, "title": "Composite Draft Rules of Procedure (3 July 1996 Text)", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/28214"}, {"id": 28227, "title": "Enclosure: UUP submission on procedural guidelines for the conduct of multi-party talks", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/28227"}, {"id": 28234, "title": "DUP amendment to rules of procedure paragraph 15A", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/28234"}, {"id": 28238, "title": "DUP amendment to rules of procedure paragraph 15A", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/28238"}, {"id": 28239, "title": "Labour submission on procedural guidelines and opening plenary agenda, 14 June 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/28239"}, {"id": 28242, "title": "Proposed additions to the Draft Rules of Procedure (27 June 1996)", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/28242"}, {"id": 28245, "title": "Draft rules of procedure (27 June 1996 text)", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/28245"}, {"id": 28250, "title": "Proposed additions to the Draft Rules of Procedure (25 June 1996)", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/28250"}, {"id": 28251, "title": "Draft rules of procedure (25 June 1996 text)", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/28251"}, {"id": 28256, "title": "DUP draft rules of procedure", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/28256"}, {"id": 28270, "title": "Draft rules of procedure (20 June 1996 text), 20.05", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/28270"}, {"id": 28275, "title": "Draft rules of procedure (19 June 1996 text)", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/28275"}, {"id": 28285, "title": "Northern Ireland negotiations \u2013\u00a0rules of procedure, 29 July 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/28285"}, {"id": 28295, "title": "UUP submission to agenda setting meeting for Strand Two", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/28295"}]}, "388": {"top_level_match": "false", "id": 388, "name": "Irish Constitution Collection", "items": [{"id": 29533, "title": "Seventeenth Amendment of the Constitution Act, 1997", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/29533"}]}, "353": {"top_level_match": "false", "id": 353, "name": "Writing Peace: The National Archives of Ireland (NAI)", "items": [{"id": 30801, "title": "Note from the Independent Chairmen enclosing a paper on confidentiality, as circulated on 30 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/30801"}, {"id": 33980, "title": "Memo from the Independent Chairmen to all participants, enclosing the revised paper on confidentiality for discussion on 1 October, 30 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/33980"}, {"id": 33986, "title": "Alternative wording for paragraph 4 of 'Points on Agreement' on confidentiality proposed by the British Government, September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/33986"}, {"id": 33987, "title": "Memo from the Independent Chairmen to all participants enclosing points of agreement and questions for discussion regarding confidentiality, 24 September 1996", "url": "/resource_collections/resource_item/33987"}]}}