Do you want to go straight to a particular resource? Use the Jump Tool and follow 2 steps:

  • Look for the pages that have the shortcut code symbol Quill - Jump To Icon (e4242)
    Jump To
    e4242
  • You can click this icon to copy the jump to url to that page to your clipboard, ready to paste into emails, notes, documents or research papers as needed.

This can usually be found in the top hero section of overview, delegations visualize, session visualize, event visualize, commentary collection, commentary item, resource collection, and resource item pages.

Enter the shortcut code for the page that you wish to search for.

Retrieving full text, please wait

These documents were scanned, collated and catalogued by Ruth Murray, Annabel Harris, Isha Pareek, Eleanor Williams, Antoine Yenk, Harriet Carter, Rosa Moore, Oliver Nicholls, Kieran Wetherwick, and Cerys Griffiths.

Collection associations (2)

Butler-Nally Meetings 1993-10-06 11:15

British Government 1993-10-07 12:00

Already have an account? Login here

Don't have an account? Register here

Forgot your password? Click here to reset it

Search Results

Enclosure: Record of a Butler/Nally Meeting on 6 October 1993

Writing Peace: The National Archives of the UK (TNA)

Key discussion points: how to manage Unionist opinion of a Joint Declaration: Irish anxious that the process would not depend on Molyneaux approval. British accepted but proposed a number of their own conditions: that the JDI be compatible with the Talks process, that Sinn Fein be thoroughly quarantined (following the end of violence) along their road to joining negotiations, and that the Irish government assure that the JDI would lead the PIRA to cease violence. Both sides perceived the Hume report to the Irish government, following his talks with Gerry Adams, as problematic for the JDI. The British perceived it as fatal. Differences remained over aspects of the new draft (JD10) that was discussed. Particularly, the British were nervous about the reference to the Irish constitution, and wanted more language pertaining to their own constitutional guarantee of the union. This latter point proved particularly thorny - debate continued over whether it mattered that the Provisionals did not accept the constitutional guarantee given the phrasing would frame it as a conviction only of the British government. The British framed this issue as crucial for the whole future process. The British are especially keen to retain plausible deniability of their involvement in the JDI should it go wrong (i.e. Loyalist backlash, failure to secure Provisional ceasefire).

downing street declaration

Jump To
i22763
Item Number
17
Oct
01
1993
CJ 4/10648
38 1993 - 1993
Search items
Related People

N/A

Related Organisations

N/A

The National Archives of the UK (TNA), digitized by the Quill Project at https://quillproject.net/resource_collections/351/.

No Transcription