Do you want to go straight to a particular resource? Use the Jump Tool and follow 2 steps:
This can usually be found in the top hero section of overview, delegations visualize, session visualize, event visualize, commentary collection, commentary item, resource collection, and resource item pages.
Enter the shortcut code for the page that you wish to search for.
These documents were scanned, collated and catalogued by Ruth Murray, Annabel Harris, Isha Pareek, Eleanor Williams, Antoine Yenk, Harriet Carter, Rosa Moore, Oliver Nicholls, Kieran Wetherwick, and Cerys Griffiths.
Collection associations (2)
Already have an account? Login here
Don't have an account? Register here
Forgot your password? Click here to reset it
None
Copyright
None
Physical Copy Information
None
Digital Copy Information
None
SPEAKING NOTE
Intelligence reports consistently confirm that the Provisionals are serious about wanting to end violence, but will not risk doing so without a pretext. A wholly unambiguous, balanced Declaration would not be a sufficient, justifying pretext. But the present draft is much improved.
The issues we must address today are set out fully in my minute and paper of 12 October. The present Irish text won’t quite do. Imperative that we have an explicit reference to Northern Ireland’ statutory constitutional guarantee in the text. But, provided we can secure Irish agreement to our amendments I recommend that we process with the Initiative.
I recommend early briefing of Jim Molyneaux on Privy Council terms, preferably by the Prime Minister. Martin Smyth’s comments earlier this week were helpful and we should give the UUP encouragement to continue a constructive approach to the JDI. Early briefing of Jim Molyneaux should help, without breaching confidentially.
Irish officials have been given notice through the Butler/Nally Group that we would want to brief Jim Molyneaux on Privy Council terms. They thought this could be helpful, provided the initiative were not “put in commission” to him. We would not be doing so: we would be seeking to secure his support, but only on the basis that an explicit reference to the constitutional guarantee were included.
The script for the briefing will need careful preparation. The briefing needs to carry conviction about the seriousness of the prospect that PIRA violence would end. This needs to be based on more than just John Hume's judgement. But we also need to keep in mind the position of the Irish Government. I envisage that Jim Molyneaux would be shown the text and the proposed amendment, and perhaps also the intelligence assessment. It would be wrong to disclose without permission the detail of the Irish Government's indirect negotiations with PIRA. It might suffice on this to say that we understand that the Irish Government would, at the appropriate stage, be ready to give their assurance that a Declaration in these terms would bring about an end to PIRA violence.
When we go back to the Irish Government we should continue to try to get from them, as early as possible, a clear understanding of when the violence would stop. Our objective should be to have that happen before the Declaration is made if at all possible (the Irish undertook in the Butler/Nally Group to consider this), but it should not be delayed beyond it.
Assuming all the lights are green we should also need to secure final understanding with the Irish on a range of detailed questions such as the terms of reference of the proposed Convention, the modalities of making the Declaration, and the drawing up of joint lines to take on the questions which will arise once this matter is public. My officials have begun work contingently on these matters.
I would like to be able to brief the Chief Constable and the GOC as soon as possible in strict confidence - ideally as soon as today's meeting has taken place.
For consideration whether next step is to brief Jim Molyneaux, or whether the issues should be considered first by a slightly wider circle of Ministers. We need to move very quickly.
Defensive
Deploy HMG's alternative paragraph 4?
I fear that both the Provisionals and the Irish would see this as a wrecking amendment – too extensive a change at this stage.
Must insist that PIRA stacks arms?
The Provisional leadership will want to enforce the ceasefire on their own members and to have weapons in store against Loyalists and splinter groups. They have deep hides: so any surrender of weapons could not be fully monitored and enforced. Our insistence would draw us into indirect negotiations and be seen as a wrecking tactic.
Who will participate in the proposed Convention?
HMG not invited. Unionists invited but not likely to attend. Realistically, likely to be a rerun of the 1984 Forum. But could lead into wider political Talks if the cessation holds.
26
22
62
61 1997 - 1997
84 1996 - 1997
112 1997 - 1997
4 1997
70 1997 - 1997
85 1997 - 1997
52 1997 - 1997
65 1992 - 1997
3
109 1997 - 1997
89 1997 - 1997
83 1997 - 1997
57 1992 - 1997
68 1997 - 1997
94 1997 - 1997
74 1997 - 1997
68 1997 - 1997
53 1997 - 1997
125 1995 - 1998
107 1996 - 1998
131 1998 - 1998
86 1998 - 1998
38 1991 - 1991
61 1991 - 1992
48 1992 - 1993
58 1993 - 1993
59 1993 - 1993
84 1993 - 1993
134 1993 - 1994
48 1996 - 1996
43 1996 - 1996
86 1996 - 1996
79 1996 - 1996
78 1996 - 1996
55 1996 - 1996
86 1996 - 1996
20 1996 - 1996
22 1996 - 1996
17 1996 - 1996
69 1996 - 1996
31 1996 - 1996
64 1996 - 1996
96 1992 - 1997
79 1996 - 1997
58 1996 - 1997
117 1996 - 1997
46 1997 - 1997
49 1996 - 1997
27 1988 - 1990
8 1989 - 1990
55 1990 - 1991
64 1991 - 1991
60 1993 - 1994
77 1993 - 1993
64 1993 - 1993
49 1993 - 1995
54 1993 - 1993
57 1993 - 1993
59 1993 - 1993
51 1993 - 1993
26 1993 - 1993
38 1993 - 1993
65 1993 - 1993
37 1993 - 1993
32 1993 - 1993
18 1993 - 1993
24 1993 - 1994
41 1993 - 1994
76 1993 - 1994
32 1993 - 1994
72 1993 - 1994
1 1994
33 1996 - 1996
14 1996 - 1997
4 1996 - 1996
41 1996 - 1996
33 1996 - 1996
30 1996 - 1996
7 1996 - 1996
24 1996 - 1996
17 1996 - 1996
9 1996 - 1996
59 1996 - 1996
73 1996 - 1996
71 1996 - 1996
54 1996 - 1996
22 1996 - 1996
53 1996 - 1996
77 1996 - 1996
67 1996 - 1996
66 1996 - 1996
49 1996 - 1996
20 1996 - 1997
32 1996 - 1996
47 1996 - 1996
34 1996 - 1996
37 /196 - 1996
31 1996 - 1996
45 1996 - 1996
33 196 - 1996
60 1996 - 1996
77 1996 - 1996
6 1996 - 1997
39 1996 - 1996
14 1996 - 1996
14 1996 - 1996
11 1996 - 1996
61 1996 - 1996
23 1996 - 1996
16 1996 - 1996
This speaking note was prepared by Tony Beeton for Patrick Mayhew's use for his meeting with John Major on 14 October 1993. It recommends that, provided the Irish Government accepted their proposed amendments to the text, the British Government go ahead with the Joint Declaration Initiative. It also describes how and why they needed to show the text of the Declaration along with the proposed amendment to James Molyneaux, and what the next steps of the Initiative would entail. The document is also heavily annotated with notes in pencil, although the identity of the annotator is uncertain.
N/A
N/A
Unless further or otherwise specified below, this material falls under Crown Copyright and contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
The National Archives of the UK (TNA), digitized by the Quill Project at https://quillproject.net/resource_collections/351/.