Do you want to go straight to a particular resource? Use the Jump Tool and follow 2 steps:
Look for the pages that have the shortcut code symbol Quill - Jump To Icon (e4242)
Jump To
e4242
You can click this icon to copy the jump to url to that page to your clipboard, ready to paste into emails, notes, documents or research papers as needed.
This can usually be found in the top hero section of overview,
delegations visualize, session visualize, event visualize, commentary collection, commentary item,
resource
collection, and resource item pages.
Enter the shortcut code for the page that you wish to search for.
Retrieving full text, please wait
These papers were digitized by Dr Shelley Deane, Annabel Harris, Isha Pareek, Antoine Yenk, Ruth Murray and Eleanor Williams. We are very grateful to the library and archives staff at Bowdoin College for all their kindness and help in assembling this material, particularly Kat Stefko and Anne Sauer.
[{"attributes":{"bold":true},"insert":"CONFIDENTIAL"},{"attributes":{"align":"center"},"insert":"\n"},{"insert":"\nFrom: Independent Chairmen Notetakers\n\t\t\t19 June 1996\n\n"},{"attributes":{"bold":true},"insert":"SUMMARY RECORD OF INFORMAL DISCUSSIONS ON PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES AND AGENDA FOR PLENARY SESSION - WEDNESDAY 19 JUNE 1995 (12.08)"},{"insert":"\n\nThose present:\n\n"},{"attributes":{"bold":true},"insert":"Independent Chairmen"},{"insert":"\nSenator Mitchell\nGeneral de Chastelain\nMr Holkeri\n\n"},{"attributes":{"bold":true},"insert":"Government Teams"},{"insert":"\nBritish Government\nIrish Government\n\n"},{"attributes":{"bold":true},"insert":"Parties"},{"insert":"\nAlliance Party\nLabour Party\nNorthern Ireland Women's Coalition\nProgressive Unionist Party\nSocial Democratic and Labour Party\nUlster Democratic Party\nUlster Democratic Unionist Party\nUnited Kingdom Unionist Party\nUlster Unionist Party\n\n1. \tAt 12.08 the "},{"attributes":{"underline":true},"insert":"Chairman"},{"insert":" reconvened the informal meeting. He indicated that prior to the adjournment of this gathering earlier in the morning, two participants had sought recognition from the chair. He now asked that these participants address the meeting, and also indicated that he felt that discussions were close to agreement on many of the present rules.\n\n2. \t"},{"attributes":{"underline":true},"insert":"Mr Robinson"},{"insert":" proceeded to outline reasons why his party had arrived this morning with high hopes of progress being made on the rules of procedure. He had provided a suggestion on 18 June regarding certain aspects of the text which consequently was deemed to be helpful and he had therefore hoped that more progress would be made on the rules this morning. Unfortunately he had quite accidentally stumbled on an issue, while looking at those rules, which now needed to be dealt with. It was a vitally important matter to his party and a strong point of principle in terms of how the proceedings of the negotiations should be governed overall. "},{"attributes":{"underline":true},"insert":"Mr Robinson"},{"insert":" indicated that his party thought this informal process had been dealing at all times with \"a blank piece of paper\". That was the reason why the DUP had included, in their proposals for the rules, proposals from the Ground Rules document - thereby allowing the Ground Rules to be superseded with these new rules. If this was not the case, he stated, there was then a need to clearly establish the standing of the Ground Rules document and also the document dated 6 June, where there were issues which affected the role of the Independent Chairman.\n\n3. \t"},{"attributes":{"underline":true},"insert":"Mr Robinson"},{"insert":" acknowledged that there were some points on the 6 June paper which might well be dealt with at a later stage under the full Agenda, but there were clearly others which could not wait for that. He continued saying that there was a need for a clear definition of \"negotiations\" in relation to several paragraphs in the Ground Rules document and the relationship, in a legal sense, that this document had with the entire process and with the new rules being drafted. In concluding his remarks, he restated an earlier point that the Ground Rules did not have any life in the present process although the legal standing of them, on their own was not being questioned. "},{"attributes":{"underline":true},"insert":"Mr Robinson"},{"insert":" referred back to remarks made earlier by Attorney General Gleeson, reinforcing the point, in his view, that the analogy of the Ground Rules to scaffolding erected around a building to either construct or repair it could also be viewed in the context of it being a temporary measure which can then be taken away once the building (ie, the new rules) was finished.\n\n3. \t"},{"attributes":{"underline":true},"insert":"Mr Mallon"},{"insert":" commenced by saying that his party regarded the Ground Rules as a sound basis for the whole process to be built upon. The Ground Rules had formed the basis for negotiations on 10 June, and they had been carefully written following discussions between the Governments and the main political parties. In his view the Ground Rules were set out in clear terms and covered all the various aspects of the negotiations. Moving on, "},{"attributes":{"underline":true},"insert":"Mr Mallon"},{"insert":" commented that it was clear that participants wanted to look at the rules of procedure to enable those negotiations to be adopted in a proper and democratic manner. There was nothing wrong with this approach. He continued saying that the Ground Rules and changes or alterations to them were, in his view, not in the remit of this particular body. The document (ie, Ground Rules) represented an agreed position and therefore he viewed the comments made from the UUP and DUP as a calculated attempt to ambush plans for producing an Agenda for a Plenary today and for the drafting of rules currently under way. He reaffirmed his view that the SDLP accepted the standing of the Ground Rules. His party, he stated, might well disagree with many of the issues contained therein but they had buried some of these in the interests of moving forward.\n\n5. \t"},{"attributes":{"underline":true},"insert":"Mr Mallon"},{"insert":" stated that the Ground Rules represented the framework as to why everyone was in the room. The rules of procedure and the contents therein were an entirely separate issue because they focused on how the business would be conducted. On a further point, "},{"attributes":{"underline":true},"insert":"Mr Mallon"},{"insert":" indicated that in his view, many of the parties around the table had made allowances towards the Unionists concerns and he admitted that this had resulted in progress. He hoped that progress would be continued. He considered, however, that attempting to change the Ground Rules only abused those parties who had made allowances up to now. He stated it was grossly unfair for anyone to be put in a position where either one made allowances towards continuing tactical points or alternatively one had to make a stand against this policy. In reference to the latter point "},{"attributes":{"underline":true},"insert":"Mr Mallon"},{"insert":" stated that the SDLP were not moving on the Ground Rules document and would accept no change to it.\n\n6. \tThe "},{"attributes":{"underline":true},"insert":"Chairman"},{"insert":" at 12.21 adjourned the meeting, subject to the call of the chair and noted that when a further meeting was reconvened, both Mr McCartney and Mr Curran wished to address the chair.\n\n[Signed]\n\n"},{"attributes":{"bold":true},"insert":"Independent Chairmen Notetakers"},{"insert":"\n"},{"attributes":{"bold":true},"insert":"19 June 1996"},{"insert":"\n\n0IC/13\n"}]
Explore Groupings
Grouping Name
910
48
10
911
48
5
912
48
6
Folder 02: Final Report, 22 January 1996
1605
11996
Folder 34: [Meetings, 16 December 1995–19 January 1996]
1606
471995 - 1996
Mitchell Principles
^
Folders 01-03: Record of Informal Discussions on Rules of Procedure and Opening Agenda, 12 June 1996 to 2 July 1996
43
3
04
114
141996 - 1996
08
119
81997 - 1997
11
123
131996 - 1996
01
113
211996 - 1996
Folders 01-02: Minutes from Strand Two Meetings, 10 July 1997 to 24 March 1998 [Parts 2 and 3 of 3]
44
2
01
355
91997 - 1998
Tab A
358
161997 - 1997
06
367
121997 - 1998
08
370
351997 - 1998
Folder 01: Press Statements by the Independent Chairmen, 6 June 1996 to 30 October 1997
45
221996 - 1997
14
377
311996 - 1996
17
381
201997 - 1997
19
384
351997 - 1998
23
389
711996 - 1997
Multi-Party Talks, 1996–1998
^
Folders 04-06: Minutes from Opening Plenary Sessions, 12 June 1996 to 30 October 1996
43
3
05
114
141996 - 1996
09
119
12
123
121996 - 1997
02
113
161996 - 1996
02
355
51998 - 1998
Folders 03-05: Strand Two Documents
44
8
Tab B
358
101997 - 1997
07
367
101997 - 1998
09
370
181998 - 1998
Folder 13: Relation of the Forum to the Talks, 1996
45
51996 - 1996
15
377
131985 - 1996
18
381
81997 - 1998
20
384
281997 - 1998
24
389
491996 - 1996
Folder 03: [Draft Versions of the Final Report]
1605
221996
06
114
121996 - 1996
Folder 07: Record of Informal Discussions on Rules of Procedure and Opening Agenda, 3 July 1996 to 25 July 1996
43
131996 - 1996
10
119
111997 - 1998
13
123
71997 - 1997
03
113
71996 - 1996
Tab C
358
81997 - 1997
Folders 06-07: Minutes of Plenary Meetings, Review Plenary Meetings, and Cross-Strand Meetings
44
2
10
370
231998 - 1998
Folders 14-16: Pre-Multi Party Talks Background Documents
45
3
16
377
91996
21
384
91997 - 1998
Folders 08-10: Minutes from Opening Plenary Sessions, 3 June 1997 to 24 September 1997
43
3
Tab D
358
91997 - 1997
Folders 08-10: Final Agreement Documents, 30 March to 10 April (Volume 1)
44
3
Folders 17-18: Liaison Subcommittee on Decommissioning – Documents and Minutes
45
2
22
384
71998 - 1998
Folders 11-13: Minutes from Opening Plenary Sessions, 30 October 1996 to 5 March 1997
43
3
Tab E
358
61997 - 1997
Folder 11: Final Agreement Documents, 30 March to 10 April (Volume 2)
44
41998
Folders 19-22: Liaison Subcommittee for Confidence Building Measures – Submissions and Minutes
45
4
Folder 14: Decommissioning Proposals and Miscellaneous Documents, May 1997 to July 1997
43
191996 - 1997
Tab F
358
71997 - 1997
Folders 23-24: Documents and Associated Items from Fall 1996 to Winter 1997 Opening Plenary Debates
This document contains the summary record of the informal discussion on procedural guidelines and the agenda for the plenary session that took place on 19 June 1996. The Chairman called Peter Robinson and Seamus Mallon to address the meeting regarding the issue of the relative status of the Ground Rules and procedural guidelines papers. Robinson said that the DUP had entered the talks under the assumption that the informal negotiations had been dealing with "a blank piece of paper", and that it was very important to his party that once the new procedural rules were in order, that the old Ground Rules as well as the Scenario paper from 6 June 1996 be set aside. This presentation was followed by a statement by Mallon, who highlighted that the Ground Rules paper formed the basis of the negotiations that began on 10 June 1996, that it and the procedural guidelines paper served different purposes, and that the present body did not have the remit to be able to make any alterations in it. He accused UUP and DUP of interrupting the talks process, and stated that the SDLP would not make any concessions on the status of the Ground Rules paper. The Chairman adjourned the meeting at 12.21.
The Quill Project has received one-time, non-exclusive use of the papers in this collection from Bowdoin College Library to make them available online as part of Writing Peace.
This document was created by Irish and British Government civil servants in the course of their duties and therefore falls under Crown Copyright and Irish Government Copyright. Both Governments are committed to the European Communities (Re-Use of Public Sector Information) Regulations.
Subseries 2 (M202.7.2) Commission Documents (1995-1998), Series 7 (M202.7) Northern Ireland Records (1995-2008), George J. Mitchell Papers, George J. Mitchell Department of Special Collections & Archives, Bowdoin College Library, Brunswick, Maine, digitized by the Quill Project at https://quillproject.net/resource_collections/125.
