We use cookies to track usage and preferences.I understandPrivacy Policy
Do you want to go straight to a particular resource? Use the Jump Tool and follow 2 steps:
This can usually be found in the top hero section of overview, delegations visualize, session visualize, event visualize, commentary collection, commentary item, resource collection, and resource item pages.
Enter the shortcut code for the page that you wish to search for.
These papers were digitized by Dr Shelley Deane, Annabel Harris, Isha Pareek, Antoine Yenk, Ruth Murray and Eleanor Williams. We are very grateful to the library and archives staff at Bowdoin College for all their kindness and help in assembling this material, particularly Kat Stefko and Anne Sauer.
Collection associations (0)
None
Already have an account? Login here
Don't have an account? Register here
Forgot your password? Click here to reset it
None
None
Copyright
None
Physical Copy Information
None
Digital Copy Information
None
Strand Two Opening Address Tuesday October 7
Labour believes that there will be no workable solution that excludes the recognition of differing identities within Northern Ireland. Much as some or many would engage in wishful thinking about ignoring the 'Irish' dimension the fact is that some 40% of the population feel Irish, to varying degrees, and want that dimension to their culture recognised in tangible institutional form. Those people are not saying to the Unionists that they should be less British but they are demanding that their status be given equal recognition.
This may appear a harsh opening comment but it has to be accepted as a basic truth by Unionists and they must stop playing mind games that any sizeable portion of the Catholic population would, at present, vote for the union. However, for Unionists to accept that truth is not to be 'giving into Republican violence' or 'surrendering' to use the emotive term. Rather it is to sit down and accept the realities and come up with workable solutions that Labour believes will meet the realistic aspirations of the vast majority of people, not just in N orthem Ireland but in the Republic and Great Britain.
If there is evidence, that given the chance tomorrow, then most Catholics would vote for a united Ireland then there is equally evidence that, given an honourable settlement, most Catholics would accept Northern Ireland. Therein lies the comfort and protection that should assure unionists and ensure their cultural identity. From that basis Unionists should enter Strand Two confidently determined to reach solutions that benefit their constituents.
Republicans have every right to state their aspirations which, when shorn of the gun, are just as legitimate as those of the Unionists. In our opinion they should not, however, enter these talks on the single premise that a united Ireland is achievable or perhaps, in the context of seeking lasting peace on this island, even desirable. They must search for a settlement that gives to their constituents lasting peace, prosperity and inclusion because that is what the people truly want. We believe that the driving force behind their support over the last thirty years has not been the pursuit of a united Ireland but a search for inclusion, acceptance, and equality.
To all sides we must say that majority rule either within Northern Ireland or within an all Ireland context is irrelevant to the future of the people of this island. While the 'wishes of majority' presently offers comfort to unionists it also, at some later date, presents them with problems. Equally the 'right of the people of Ireland to decide their own future' gives solace to Republicans but offers no solution whatsoever to the future peaceful governance of this island. What we must all agree is that majoritarianism offers no solutions and that our only hope is to construct solutions that make us all winners.
Labour firmly believes that all Ireland co-operation not only recognises different cultural identities but also provides a wonderful opportunity to develop social interaction and institutions that will be of enormous benefit to our people culturally, economically and socially.
Having an irrational land border distorts any socio economic infrastructure but at least in Europe they are working to overcome these drawbacks. Only here, in Ireland, have we allowed ancient disputes to hinder our development. If there ever was a case of biting your nose to spite your face then this is it.
Labour believes that the people will benefit from co-operation in real and meaningful ways in areas such as health, education, public utilities, tourism and general infrastructure. However, we caution that the people must be involved in real and meaningful senses. This concept reaches far beyond simply two legislatures or i governments arranging matters but goes down into the communities involved. The people of Monaghan, Cavan, Tyrone or Armagh do not want to be simply ruled, at a distance, by legislatures in Belfast or Dublin. Rather they want real and meaningful involvement in the institutions that govern vital services in their lives.
Mr Chairman Labour expresses regret over the recent decision of Minister McDaid concerning the cross border tourist campaign. Such insensitivity beggars belief However, perhaps it was a blessing in disguise in that it highlighted a real concern in Northern Ireland\~ that the Dublin government will treat Northern Ireland like an errant child and operate the old maxim 'do as I say not as I do'.
The people of Northern Ireland must have cast iron assurances from Dublin that cooperation means really that and that there is a willingness to be even handed in the implementation of any matters that are devolved to cross border bodies. Firmly but assuredly we assert that co-operation is not a one way street but, at this stage, we are very concerned about the actual operational mode of the Dublin government on the ground.
Labour is firmly in support of cross border institutions were there are demonstrable benefits to the entire people of this island.
10
5
6
1 1996
47 1995 - 1996
3
14 1996 - 1996
8 1997 - 1997
13 1996 - 1996
21 1996 - 1996
2
9 1997 - 1998
16 1997 - 1997
12 1997 - 1998
35 1997 - 1998
22 1996 - 1997
31 1996 - 1996
20 1997 - 1997
35 1997 - 1998
71 1996 - 1997
3
14 1996 - 1996
12 1996 - 1997
16 1996 - 1996
5 1998 - 1998
8
10 1997 - 1997
10 1997 - 1998
18 1998 - 1998
5 1996
13 1985 - 1996
8 1997 - 1998
28 1997 - 1998
49 1996 - 1996
22 1996
12 1996 - 1996
13 1996 - 1996
11 1997 - 1998
7 1997 - 1997
7 1996 - 1996
8 1997 - 1997
2
23 1998 - 1998
3
9 1996
9 1997 - 1998
3
9 1997 - 1997
3
2
7 1998 - 1998
3
6 1997 - 1997
4 1998 - 1998
4
19 1996 - 1997
7 1997 - 1997
2
9 1996 - 1997
1 1998
43 1996 - 1998
17 1997 - 1998
49 1996 - 1998
6 1997 - 1997
10 1996
2
2
This document contains the text of the opening remarks made by the Labour delegation on the launch of Strand 2. Labour criticized the unionists for disregarding the relevance of the 'Irish' dimension, and asked republicans to aim for a settlement that gave its constituents lasting peace instead of aiming solely for reunification.
No Associations
N/A
The Quill Project has received one-time, non-exclusive use of the papers in this collection from Bowdoin College Library to make them available online as part of Writing Peace.
Subseries 2 (M202.7.2) Commission Documents (1995-1998), Series 7 (M202.7) Northern Ireland Records (1995-2008), George J. Mitchell Papers, George J. Mitchell Department of Special Collections & Archives, Bowdoin College Library, Brunswick, Maine, digitized by the Quill Project at https://quillproject.net/resource_collections/125.