We use cookies to track usage and preferences.I understandPrivacy Policy
Do you want to go straight to a particular resource? Use the Jump Tool and follow 2 steps:
This can usually be found in the top hero section of overview, delegations visualize, session visualize, event visualize, commentary collection, commentary item, resource collection, and resource item pages.
Enter the shortcut code for the page that you wish to search for.
These papers were digitized by Dr Shelley Deane, Annabel Harris, Isha Pareek, Antoine Yenk, Ruth Murray and Eleanor Williams. We are very grateful to the library and archives staff at Bowdoin College for all their kindness and help in assembling this material, particularly Kat Stefko and Anne Sauer.
Collection associations (0)
None
Already have an account? Login here
Don't have an account? Register here
Forgot your password? Click here to reset it
None
None
Copyright
None
Physical Copy Information
None
Digital Copy Information
None
LABOUR Strand Two Submission on ‘Principles and Requirements’
1. The objective of Strand Two must be to achieve workable arrangements on the island of Ireland that will command widespread acceptance and support amongst all the people of Ireland.
2. Those arrangements must address two principle items; that the people of Northern Ireland will decide the future of Northern Ireland and that the legitimate ‘Irish’ aspiration of Northerners be given recognition in a real\, meaningful and tangible form.
3. Consequent on the above\, that steps should be taken to remove the claim of jurisdiction over Northern Ireland\, by the Irish Republic\, and that ‘cross border’ and all Ireland institutions and bodies and relationships are established and clearly seen to be working.
4. The relations between Northern Ireland and the Republic should reflect the reality of the massive practical co-operation that exists between both parts of Ireland. Any new arrangements should increase and develop this contact and\, in addition\, seek to remove barriers to economic\, social and cultural development.
5. Labour would support the categories for development as listed in ‘Frameworks for the Future’ but believes that these topics should not be exclusive. Amongst others\, there is a need to specifically address the issues that can be of real benefit to peoples in Border regions. Public utilities\, schools\, health clinics\, General practitioner provision and manpower planning are but examples of services distorted by an ‘irrational’ border.
6. If new institutions are to be accepted\, supported\, and really help the people\, then the ‘control’ of these bodies must be democratic\, accountable and transparent in their deliberations and decisions.
7. Labour does not believe that the proposals in the Framework document for implementation bodies would be acceptable to the vast majority of the people The introduction of more bodies that are many steps removed from the electors while dealing with major issues affecting their lives is a reversal of what is being attempted in these Talks. The Government’s proposals merely attempt to maintain as much of the status quo while paying lip service to democracy.
8. Widespread acceptance and support will come from the trust that can only be developed through involvement and transparency.
9. Labour proposes that different methods of administration be applied depending on the nature and scope of the institution. These would encompass the use of local\, regional and national participation as appropriate.
10. Labour proposes that composition of all Bodies be approved by the relevant legislatures and that those legislatures receive and approve reports on the activities of such bodies.
11. Labour supports the proposal that institutional arrangements should be established to permit the regular meeting of legislatures and administrators within Ireland but would wish to develop this to local and ‘regional’ arrangements.
12. As long as the people of Northern Ireland genuinely have the right to determine their own future\, there is no valid reason for anyone fearing more practical contact throughout Ireland. Equally\, there is no excuse for falling to develop a peaceful\, culturally ‘content’ and economically prosperous island.
12/10/97
10
5
6
1 1996
47 1995 - 1996
3
14 1996 - 1996
8 1997 - 1997
13 1996 - 1996
21 1996 - 1996
2
9 1997 - 1998
16 1997 - 1997
12 1997 - 1998
35 1997 - 1998
22 1996 - 1997
31 1996 - 1996
20 1997 - 1997
35 1997 - 1998
71 1996 - 1997
3
14 1996 - 1996
12 1996 - 1997
16 1996 - 1996
5 1998 - 1998
8
10 1997 - 1997
10 1997 - 1998
18 1998 - 1998
5 1996 - 1996
13 1985 - 1996
8 1997 - 1998
28 1997 - 1998
49 1996 - 1996
22 1996
12 1996 - 1996
13 1996 - 1996
11 1997 - 1998
7 1997 - 1997
7 1996 - 1996
8 1997 - 1997
2
23 1998 - 1998
3
9 1996
9 1997 - 1998
3
9 1997 - 1997
3
2
7 1998 - 1998
3
6 1997 - 1997
4 1998 - 1998
4
19 1996 - 1997
7 1997 - 1997
2
9 1996 - 1997
1 1998
43 1996 - 1998
17 1997 - 1998
49 1996 - 1998
6 1997 - 1997
10 1996
2
2
This document was presented by Labour regarding the principles and requirements envisioned by the party in relation to Strand 2. Labour highlighted that the two principles that Strand 2 arrangements should address were consent and self-determination. The paper calls for a change in articles 2 and 3 of the Irish constitution, and the creation of new transparent and accountable cross-border institutions that would facilitate economic, social and cultural development. Labour also address the Framework documents, including both elements that were acceptable to them and those that they found disappointing.
No Associations
N/A
The Quill Project has received one-time, non-exclusive use of the papers in this collection from Bowdoin College Library to make them available online as part of Writing Peace.
Subseries 2 (M202.7.2) Commission Documents (1995-1998), Series 7 (M202.7) Northern Ireland Records (1995-2008), George J. Mitchell Papers, George J. Mitchell Department of Special Collections & Archives, Bowdoin College Library, Brunswick, Maine, digitized by the Quill Project at https://quillproject.net/resource_collections/125.