Do you want to go straight to a particular resource? Use the Jump Tool and follow 2 steps:
This can usually be found in the top hero section of overview, delegations visualize, session visualize, event visualize, commentary collection, commentary item, resource collection, and resource item pages.
Enter the shortcut code for the page that you wish to search for.
These papers were digitized by Dr Shelley Deane, Annabel Harris, Isha Pareek, Antoine Yenk, Ruth Murray and Eleanor Williams. We are very grateful to the library and archives staff at Bowdoin College for all their kindness and help in assembling this material, particularly Kat Stefko and Anne Sauer.
Collection associations (0)
None
Already have an account? Login here
Don't have an account? Register here
Forgot your password? Click here to reset it
None
None
Copyright
None
Physical Copy Information
None
Digital Copy Information
None
Ulster Democratic Party
Strand 1, Item 4 Strand 2, Items 3 and 4
The Ulster Democratic Party believes that the principle relationship that must be addressed is that between the people of Northern Ireland. If sufficient consensus is not found between Ulster Protestants and Ulster Catholics upon how their society shall be shaped and governed, then it is unlikely that the negotiation process shall succeed. It is this internal relationship which forms the cornerstone of the negotiations.
However we do recognise the need for an agreement which addresses the totality of relationships. The Ulster Democratic Party will pursue such an agreement but not in the shape or form envisaged by the British and Irish governments in their “Frameworks for the Future”.
There is no consent for the creation of political structures between Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic, which allow interference in the internal jurisdiction of this part of the United Kingdom. We foresee a friendly and co-operative relationship with the Republic of Ireland on the basis of mutual advantage and transparency. However, we see this within the confines of a wider relationship between other regions of the British Isles and possible only in the context of the removal of political impediments to a co-operative relationship between our jurisdictions.
It cannot be expected that a friendly relationship will develop between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland while there exists no respect for the territorial integrity of Northern Ireland as a legitimate political and geographic entity and as a member region of the United Kingdom.
If greater co-operation were appropriate between our jurisdictions and across the British Isles, a proposed model for such co-operation should conform to the following principles;
It must observe the principle of subsidiarity It must not create supranational bodies There must be consent for the relationships and their dynamic There must be transparency of operation There must be unanimity of decision making between regions It must encompass the symmetry of relationships
Co-operation is by definition a voluntary act. The North — South focus of the proposals advanced by the British and Irish governments and the nationalist and republican parties are too narrow and confining and will not provoke the support of the unionist population. The concept is asymmetrical and does not reflect the totality of relationships across the British Isles.
The need for British Isles wide structures is enhanced with the creation of a Scottish Parliament and a Welsh Assembly alongside the inevitable emergence of a Northern Ireland legislative assembly. It would be foolish for the regions of the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland not to co-operate on a wide range of matters. Indeed issues such as the environment, transport, fishing, narcotics, migration, professional standards, tourism, and agriculture can only be dealt with effectively on a British Isles wide basis.
We believe a council of the British Isles would represent an appropriate model for cooperation between the regions on an issue by issue basis. It would reflect the totality of relationships and recognise the changing needs of the people in Northern Ireland as a region on the periphery of the UK and of the British Isles as a region in itself on the periphery of an evolving Europe.
10
5
6
1 1996
47 1995 - 1996
3
14 1996 - 1996
8 1997 - 1997
13 1996 - 1996
21 1996 - 1996
2
9 1997 - 1998
16 1997 - 1997
12 1997 - 1998
35 1997 - 1998
22 1996 - 1997
31 1996 - 1996
20 1997 - 1997
35 1997 - 1998
71 1996 - 1997
3
14 1996 - 1996
12 1996 - 1997
16 1996 - 1996
5 1998 - 1998
8
10 1997 - 1997
10 1997 - 1998
18 1998 - 1998
5 1996
13 1985 - 1996
8 1997 - 1998
28 1997 - 1998
49 1996 - 1996
22 1996
12 1996 - 1996
13 1996 - 1996
11 1997 - 1998
7 1997 - 1997
7 1996 - 1996
8 1997 - 1997
2
23 1998 - 1998
3
9 1996
9 1997 - 1998
3
9 1997 - 1997
3
2
7 1998 - 1998
3
6 1997 - 1997
4 1998 - 1998
4
19 1996 - 1997
7 1997 - 1997
2
9 1996 - 1997
1 1998
43 1996 - 1998
17 1997 - 1998
49 1996 - 1998
6 1997 - 1997
10 1996
2
2
This document, presented by the UDP, describes their position on the nature, form and structure of arrangements in relation to Strand 2, and the creation of new relationships between the arrangements arising from Strands 1 and 2. The UDP stated that the principle relationship of concern was the one between the people of Northern Ireland, and while they rejected the Framework documents, they encouraged a cooperative relationship between the UK and the Republic of Ireland as long as it was founded on a respect for the territorial integrity of Northern Ireland as an integral part of the UK. They also stated their support for a council of the British Isles, which would reflect the totality of relationships and act as a forum for the regional administrations to cooperate on an issue by issue basis.
No Associations
N/A
The Quill Project has received one-time, non-exclusive use of the papers in this collection from Bowdoin College Library to make them available online as part of Writing Peace.
Subseries 2 (M202.7.2) Commission Documents (1995-1998), Series 7 (M202.7) Northern Ireland Records (1995-2008), George J. Mitchell Papers, George J. Mitchell Department of Special Collections & Archives, Bowdoin College Library, Brunswick, Maine, digitized by the Quill Project at https://quillproject.net/resource_collections/125.