Do you want to go straight to a particular resource? Use the Jump Tool and follow 2 steps:
This can usually be found in the top hero section of overview, delegations visualize, session visualize, event visualize, commentary collection, commentary item, resource collection, and resource item pages.
Enter the shortcut code for the page that you wish to search for.
This collection was catalogued and the metadata was recorded by Antoine Yenk. The cover photograph is copyright Daphne Trimble, used with permission.
Collection associations (0)
None
Already have an account? Login here
Don't have an account? Register here
Forgot your password? Click here to reset it
None
None
Copyright
None
Physical Copy Information
None
Digital Copy Information
None
12
96 1995 - 1996
55 1991 - 1996
119 1991 - 1997
91 1996 - 1998
121 1991 - 1997
65 1993 - 1997
107 1992 - 1998
88 1971 - 1998
57 1949 - nown
133 1991 - 1998
73 1992 - 1997
71 1994 - 1997
The Labour Party's response document, dated 2 December 1996, addresses procedural questions posed by the Independent Chairmen. The document proposes that all participants have the right to table motions, but the Business Committee, in conjunction with the chair, has the authority to manage the negotiation procedures and ensure participants act in good faith. The Labour Party stresses the importance of the chair's discretion in deeming motions 'significant' and managing time effectively to prevent endless, unproductive discussions. They argue that motions should be amendable, but the complexity of amendments should be managed to avoid protracted debates. Labour criticizes the UK Unionists for attempting to undermine the agreed-upon rules and procedures, which they believe hinders substantive progress. They advocate for the chair to assert authority over participants who lack commitment or good faith, and they call for Sinn Féin's meaningful participation to foster a more effective negotiation climate. Labour warns that failure to create a productive negotiation environment could erode public confidence in the peace process and potentially lead to increased paramilitary activity, benefiting sectarian political parties.
No Associations
N/A
The Quill Project has kindly received permission from Queen's University Belfast to publish digital copies of these documents. This agreement does not cover any further publication or manipulation of these images. Further enquiries about the collection should be directed to the McClay Library at Queen's University Belfast, where the physical papers are held.
McClay Library and Archives, Queen's University Belfast, digitized by the Quill Project at https://quillproject.net/resource_collections/384/.
No Transcription